CLBB cookbook (352 views)

I ended up printing it out and putting it into a binder. I would have definitely saved the files, but I suspect it might be on a laptop that has since packed it in. I'll have a look once I get home tomorrow and see what I can find.

Attaching a whole cookbook (or pages) here would be "publishing" that cookbook and I fear that could be a copyright violation unless you have written evidence that the cookbook was released to the public domain. Please don't post any pdf's on this forum as that would put us in jeopardy in that way on this forum. Thanks. (EDITED to rephrase)

Could it be done the way you did it in the "Admin-are-testing" thread? (By, properly, attributing the - "Source".)

Also see: community.cookinglight.com/showthread.php?168860-Copyrighting-Recipes-Two-sources&highlight=copyright

Another, originally from a CL post -
07-21-2007, 01:05 PM #29 jmg 
Join DateSep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts 49

"from a Google search:
 The Law of Recipes - Copyright & Patent Information
. By Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.

'Every week I get a handful of questions about whether recipes are copyrighted or copyrightable, and whether a recipe can be patented. This page is intended to shed some light on these common questions.

Are recipes copyrightable?

First, mere listings of ingredients as in recipes, formulas, compounds or prescriptions are not subject to copyright protection. However, where a recipe or formula is accompanied by substantial literary expression in the form of an explanation or directions, or when there is a combination of recipes, as in a cookbook, there may be a basis for copyright protection.

It is worth spending a moment to discuss what is meant by "substantial literary expression." In copyright law there is a prohibition against protecting even original expression if there is only a limited number of ways to convey said expression. The best example I can give is from an actual case where the creator of a mail in sweepstakes claimed copyright infringement because someone uses substantially the same language in their mail in sweepstakes rules. The court found that there is only a limited number of ways to say "send your name, address and telephone number to..." You could alter this to say "in order to enter send to .... your name, address and telephone number." There does not need to be exact identity for copyright infringement, all that is required is substantial similarity. If the former is copyrighted then the later would infringe under this substantial similarity test. Therefore, there is a prohibition against protection when there is only a limited number of ways to express an idea. This is referred to as idea/expression merger. This has significant impact for recipes as well. Simply listing generic steps or directions cannot, in my opinion, be protected. So a recipe that lists the ingredients and then says "mix together, pour into pan, put into oven at 350" seems to me to lack "substantial literary expression." Of course, the more originality that is infused the more likely some copyright protection will exist, but taking the component pieces of a recipe is no violation.

It is also worth spending a moment to discuss copyright protection for compilations. While you could copy a recipe from a book, copying the entire book would violate the copyright in the book, which is a compilation. Protection under the copyright law extends only to
"original works of authorship" that are fixed in a tangible form (a copy). "Original" means merely that the author produced the work by his own intellectual effort, as distinguished from copying an existing work. Important for our discussion here is an understanding that the originality requirement is very low indeed. It is enough originality to take unprotected component pieces and arrange them in an original fashion. The book itself would be entitled to an arrangement copyright but the component pieces would not be protected. Therefore, you could copy a recipe but not copy and republish the entire book. The book is what would be protected, not the individual component pieces.'"